Saturday, January 12, 2008

More Bastiat

Alright, I've mentioned Bastiat's broken window parable before. Here's a quick recap of the argument (modified just a bit):
  • A clan of tax protesters storms the White House, smashing all the windows.
  • The president hires a window repair man to fix the windows.
  • Argument: This is good for the economy because it provides work for the window repair man.
Bastiat goes on to explain that this is a fallacy because you need to consider how that money would have otherwise been spent. Perhaps the Prez would have used it for speech therapy or something else that would benefit us all...

A current manifestation of this argument is that war is good for the economy because it provides jobs. This is a very potent argument used to defend the existence of the military industrial complex and aggressive war. But, this is really the same as breaking a massive amount of windows. We need to consider what other things the hundreds of billions of dollars could be spent on if we didn't have this war to pay for. Maybe we could even let our citizens keep more of their hard-earned money so they could use it for, oh I don't know, health insurance, education, skittles? Pretty hard to kill someone with skittles (although they are not good for your teeth).

Taking this further, everything is purchased at the expense of some other thing. It begs the question...what are our national resources best used for? What are our individual resources best used for? What do we need to pool our money together to accomplish through the state, and what portion of our income is best spent at our own discretion?

Imagine over one-third of your yearly income. Imagine writing a check for that amount. Then think of everything the federal government has provided for you. Then think about the possibility that intervention abroad has incited hatred making you less safe, that No Child Left Behind has deteriorated school performance and that the Patriot Act has violated civil liberties.

Then remember that those thousands of dollars have actually already been spent and are being used to pay interest on foreign debt. Then remember that every household is actually accountable for $400, 000 in public debt!

The system, our elected government, with the help of corporate influence, is being used for its own preservation at best, and our exploitation at worst. What is the solution? We must first hold the beast accountable with education, and starve it with cuts in taxes and spending. We need to stop using our resources to smash windows, and start using it to secure our individual security, personal sovereignty, and economic prosperity.

Friday, January 11, 2008

Penn and Teller

Frank Luntz may be the most evil person living today. Meet your enemy ladies and gentleman (courtesy of Penn and Teller).

Thursday, January 10, 2008

Roli poli fish heads

I really have nothing much to say. But, that happens to be the mode of thinking I prefer when saying stuff, so I won't let it stop me. Sure, I should have plenty to say, having just watched the Republican debate, but I really don't. I think I'm comfortably numb. Okay, that's enough . Here are some quotes to moisten the noodle.
Drink heavily, and buy more guns.
- Jim Bovard, at Freedom Summit 2005, responding to a question about what we should do now about government abuses of rights.
In a truly civil society peopled primarily by enlightened, sober individuals, the carriage of arms might be deemed gratuitous, but it is nonetheless harmless. In a society that measures up to anything less than that, the option to carry arms is a necessity.
-Geek with a .45
Just something different. Trying to gather my thoughts from the debate I guess. Which seems like too much to handle at once.

Wednesday, January 9, 2008

Bo

Once long ago a young man by the name of Bo lived a solitary life in a small thatched hut deep within a remote mountain valley. There he tended to a plot of alpine land rich with beans, tubers, and barley. Through the center of the valley flowed a stream which meandered among various fruit and shade trees and from the fields, trees, and stream Bo gathered what he needed to eat and drink.

Each morning as the first rays of sun illuminated the high peaks Bo would emerge from his hut and walk down the gentle slope to his fields. He would drop his hoe into the moist soil and begin his daily routine. As he worked he would think about his mother and father, as well as his siblings. He remembered his sister, the little one, who would grasp his finger tightly and smile. And these thoughts eased the strain of his tight shoulders as he worked the land.

But these moments always faded to heartache as Bo recalled the tragedy; first his mother, then his father, and finally the last of his brothers and sisters. Each day another would awake with the cough, and each would be dead by evening. This continued until only Bo and his little sister were left. And then finally one day she awoke with the cough as well. And these days Bo would look on the hillside opposite his hut to see the place where he buried them. And because of this his fields were fertilized with tears.

Many years passed, and good fortune brought him abundance in fruit and grain; more than he could ever eat himself. But Bo never saw another soul, and he was often lonely, and often thought of venturing from his home. He knew his extra grain was of value and could be sold at a town many miles away. As a boy he had traveled with his father once into town, but remembered the perilous journey, and dared not risk leaving the valley alone. He did not know the path, and could not let his fields choke with weeds for that many days. So, he put the thought to rest, and stored his grain to preserve it as best as he could.

One day as he was fishing, Bo heard rustling in some bushes across the stream. Thinking it a wolf or bear, he quickly hid behind a nearby boulder. His heart pounded and he stood perfectly still as he heard the creature approach the water. He then heard some splashing and figured the beast had decided to swim across. Terrified, he picked up a stone and crouched slowly peaking around the side of the boulder, ready to strike if it attacked him. To his astonishment, it was a young woman who bathed casually, humming to herself and swimming gracefully against the current. He relaxed and put down the stone, admiring her brown hair and bare shoulders. He feared he would startle her if he didn't remain hidden. He wished to speak with her, but could not decide what he would say anyway. Bo continued to watch as she emerged from the water and dressed herself. His heart continued to pound. He remained silent as she walked away.

After this he thought of the girl often, and went to the boulder at the same time of day in case she were to return, which she often did. Then one warm day, after she didn't arrive, Bo decided to swim himself. He removed his clothes and relaxed in the cool water, humming to himself the familiar tune. As he swam he noticed giggling from the bushes. She had noticed him before, and had been spying on him this day. Luli was her name, and she splashed Bo and swam with him. That day she followed him back to his fields.

Luli lived with Bo, and loved him, and Bo became madly in love with Luli. Bo awakened every morning to water splashed in his face, or laughter, or her warm skin against his. They grew very close, and she was very playful and happy with him. And she often hugged and kissed him and told him how much she loved him. After several months living with Luli, he could not imagine life without her, and believed he needed nothing more from life than her company.

Then one day Luli told Bo that she needed to leave. And she did, and would not tell Bo why. And Bo cried often. Again watering the soil with his tears. But his fields did not produce as much as before. Bo did not leave the hut some days, and sat on his bed and thought. He thought about everything they had said to each other and everything they had done. He could not understand why she left. And his fields dried and cracked. And when he walked to the stream it was not to fish but only to think about Luli. He lived off the sparse fruit from the trees. He was often hungry.

After several years, Bo still could not understand why she had gone, but his despair had changed to anger. He decided he must know why she had left him. He could live without her by his side, but he could not live without knowing why. If it was a misunderstanding, he had to make it right. If it was her willful choice, he had to know it. Either way, he would not rest until he found out. The next day he walked from valley and never returned.

Tuesday, January 8, 2008

Pearl Buck

Overwhelmed with the mayhem and distractions of the modern world I decided to slip back into the beginning of the last century to a rural farm in Imperial China in The Good Earth by Pearl Buck. Reading this novel was such a relief I sincerely wish I could erase it from my memory and begin it all over again. No spoilers, I'll just say a few words...

Imagine looking over a plot of farmland and saying to yourself "I can live on this." And I mean, "I can use my bare hands to work the soil and feed myself and my family." There would be perpetual back breaking labor with little time for anything else. There would be the regular fear of drought or flood and starvation. And despite rigorous labor there are no guarantees - life continues to teeter on the whims of chance.

This life is hard to imagine, and I find something so noble and comforting about it. It made me want to brew, which I did, which gave me more time to think about it. I think we all know that none of us are capable of sustaining ourselves, and I guess I find that somewhat uncomfortable personally. We leave so much of our fate in the hands of others, and this gives us so much prosperity, but also so much responsibility. It makes me want to pick up a trowel. Reading about all the hardships I almost feel as though I've left my own fields go to weeds.

I highly recommend this book. Its language is so simple and readable, its themes so ubiquitous, I am going to have it purged from my mind at the first opportunity for a repeat.

Thursday, January 3, 2008

Liberal stuff

lib·er·al·ism
Pronunciation: \ˈli-b(ə-)rə-ˌli-zəm\
Function: noun

a: often capitalized: a movement in modern Protestantism emphasizing intellectual liberty and the spiritual and ethical content of Christianity
b: a theory in economics emphasizing individual freedom from restraint and usually based on free competition, the self-regulating market, and the gold standard
c: a political philosophy based on belief in progress, the essential goodness of the human race, and the autonomy of the individual and standing for the protection of political and civil liberties (Webster)

Yes, I am a shameless Liberal. I particularly like "intellectual liberty" and "freedom from restraint." But put together, some folks seem to use a relaxed interpretation - such as "liberty to say anything that serves my interests without restraint."
Read my lips. No new taxes.
-George H.W. Bush
The challenge is to practice politics as the art of making what appears to be impossible, possible.
-Hillary Clinton

When John Kerry is president, people like Christopher Reeve are going to walk. Get up out of that wheelchair and walk again.
-John Edwards
Okay, so that last one is a joke, but you get the idea. Presidential candidates can somehow promise the impossible - improve the performance of local schools, save the economy from recession, and prevent suicide terrorism and the global spread of extremism. Are these things really possible? Occasionally it even seems like the politicians are afraid to trust the concept of liberty itself...
We just can't trust the American people to make those types of choices...Government has to make those choices for people.
-Hillary Clinton (to Rep. Dennis Hastert)
What? Which decisions are you, in Washington, more capable of making than I about my life? What privileged information do you have about me, in which to base these decisions, that I am unaware of? It seems clear the principles of Liberalism, which are at the very foundations of this country, have been completely forgotten by many in the stew of the political frenzy. But this problem isn't new:
Liberty means responsibility. That is why most men dread it.
-George Bernard Shaw
If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.
-George Orwell
So, why aren't more people exercising their right to run a campaign on the hard facts and realistic capabilities? What happened to running on the "essential goodness of the human race, and the autonomy of the individual?" Is it because individuals don't contribute to their campaigns as much as huge corporations? Seems like a possibility to me.

Here are some modern translations of some historic phrases:
Give me liberty, or give me a subsidy for my corporate farm.
-Overpaid CEO
I regret that I have but one life to give for the military industrial complex.
-Soldier
Obedience is the true foundation of liberty. The disobedient must be terrorists.
-Rudy Ghouliani
Power is the only thing you cannot have unless you are willing to take liberty from others.
-Garden variety politician
**************
The real ones:
Give me liberty, or give me death.
-Patrick Henry
I regret that I have but one life to give for my country.
-Nathan Hale
Disobedience is the true foundation of liberty. The obedient must be slaves.
-Henry David Thoreau
Liberty is the only thing you cannot have unless you are willing to give it to others.
-William Allen White
*********

The people never give up their liberties but under some delusion.
-Edmund Burke

Who is watching the watchmen?

The few times I have listened I have found Minnesota Public Radio host Kerri Miller's show "Midmorning" relatively fair. She kept the questions fair and unbiased. Then, this morning, when she was interviewing Iowa caucus goers, she said this:
Do you think people are so angry, so fed up with the current medical system, that they are ready to go in the opposite direction, towards universal health care?
I would expect this kind of demagoguery from a political candidate, but not a reputable talk show host on public radio. I'm most concerned because no one seems to recognize this type of deception.

These are words from a soothing, innocent, academic, inquisitive female voice; seemingly a champion of truth. Then, she casually asks whether universal health care, the opposite of what people are fed up with, is the answer...I don't care if universal health coverage is the answer or not - this is how tyrants get elected to office, and doesn't belong on public radio.

Is our public education system preparing children's brains for this type of treatment? Are public schools really teaching their students the skills necessary to identify rhetoric and demagogy? Or are teachers afraid of handing students that power? I fear our country is not prepared for this. Public figures know this, and they are using it to advance their agendas.

Who is watching the watchmen?